The author
of the New York Times article, a certain Lena
Williams, began it as follows: By any
definition, I am a flirt. I have been known
to adjust mens ties when they perfectly
straight. To cup anothers hand during
an introductory handshake. To wink ever so
slightly at alluring strangers across a crowded
room, and to end conversations with the endearment
sweetheart.
The punctuation apart,
how can she confess to being so ghastly
- let alone to being proud of it! I would
travel a million miles to get away from
a person like that. Displays of lechery
at the office Christmas party are much more
acceptable than her kind of behaviour. They
are at least honest and straightforward,
and therefore much easier to deal with.
The Guardian,
December 14, 1996
They have got rid of
the Christian God, and now feel obliged
to cling all the more firmly to Christian
morality: this is English consistency...
In England, in response to every emancipation
from theology one has to reassert ones
position in a fear-inspiring manner as a
moral fanatic.
Nietzsche, Twilight
of the Idols, Expeditions of an Untimely
Man, 5
It is for this reason
[sexual segregation] we can neither accept
a compliment nor reject a pass, or at least
not with the slightest grace. Also for this
reason the pleasure of doing trivial things
with the opposite sex, like hanging out
or having lunch or shopping, is denied to
us for ever. When Englishmen and women meet,
it is always with an air of purpose - for
work or courtship, by prior, formal arrangement.
Vogue, January
1997, p.89
This is the only country
in Europe where young men think if they
dont drink eight pints on Friday night
people will call them a poof.
The Guardian,
December 28, 1996 (The year in review by
Catherine Bennett)
The rolling English
drunkard made the rolling
English road.
A reeling road, a rolling road, that rambles
round
the shire.
G. K. Chesterton,
The Rolling English Road.
I shall attempt to
guide the novice through the labyrinth of
the native sexuality. And, specifically,
about the sexuality characterising the male
of the species and more aptly pertaining
to the sphere of pre-coital approach generally
known by the term flirting. It should be
noted that these conclusions have been reached
after painstaking zoological observation
in various contexts in which the mating
game is permitted. In most cases, my observations
found a fertile ground in venues like pubs
and clubs. Let me make a fine distinction
at this point, and introduce some special
terminology, as the inexperienced at the
workings of the species might have some
unanswered questions.
Pubs is the general
term applied to the natural habitat in which
the great majority of the species exercises
their social rituals regardless of age (anybody
over eighteen), sex, social class, beliefs,
etc. As a university guide for Incoming
Erasmus Students says: A good deal
of English social life, especially for the
young and unattached, centres on the pub.
Clubs is a more exclusive
habitat in which mating patterns of the
young and unattached achieve a higher level
of intensity. However, in both these venues,
the consumption of yeast extract is a must.
It is the social ritual par excellence.
Not just that, but it would be considered
an insult to the males virility to
consume quantities of yeast extract in less
than a pint. Pint is another culture-specific
term which refers to the glass container
of yeast extract, commonly known as beer
in other species. So, if a native suggests
that you should go for a pint he means to
go for a beer.
A male would not dream
of manifesting or expressing in any way
whatsoever familiarity or interaction with
the female of the species had he not beforehand
consumed a minimum of five pints. Of course,
this depends on the individuals idiosyncrasy
and physical stamina. And indeed, a resistance
to this substance is considered to be the
sine qua non of manhood to such extend that
women are known to divorce men who have
repeatedly proved to have a tolerance below
five pints. (Ive actually heard it
in a pub: No, I wouldnt go with
a man who cannot take his pints!).
To recapitulate, the
possibility of expressing sexual behaviour
begins with the landmark of the fifth pint.
At this point the male becomes irritated,
disquieted, frustrated, myopic as a miraculous
metamorphosis takes place. And indeed, this
far exceeds any other phenomenon in the
natural universe, far beyond the metamorphosis
of a larva into a butterfly. What happens
then?
Well, the individual
animal, from his prior state of a priori
penislessness metamorphoses into a huge,
wobbling, pulsating phallus, preparing a
massively imminent explosion of penis extract.
In such a state, the myopic animal will
seize upon anything that moves and remotely
resembles a female of the species. If he
is lucky enough, the female will condescend
and the flirting ritual will begin. During
this time, of course, the consumption of
liquid yeast extract would have continued,
culminating to a total of seven, eight,
or even, nine pints. At such a state the
male will follow the female at her nest
in order for the procreation ritual to take
place. But, as it so happens with most of
these cases, and due to an excessive consumption
of yeast extract, the huge, wobbling, pulsating
phallus will al-chemically re-metamorphose
into a tiny little piece of shit that would
remain undetectable even under the scientific
scrutiny of the worlds most powerful
microscope.
Funnily enough posteriori
penislessness (after the small penisfulness
interval inbetween) at the end of a long
nights entertainment goes
hand-in-hand with pennylessness which, to
a certain degree, explains the financial
shortcomings of students.
*
So what is the
true English sexual vice? I asked.
Julien became pompous, Cuckoldry.
Not alcohol? I asked sweetly.
Maria Alvarez,
Smack Habits, GQ, December 1996, p100
Native promiscuity
(and native drunken debauchery) is the inevitable
outcome of a censored, and consequently
abstemious, attitude towards the art of
flirting, ultimately linked to the general
impoverished view towards all things amorous.
In other words, having been deprived of
the possibility of playing the sweet game
of flirtation as well as freely savouring
the excitement of passionate emotional states,
they attempt to compensate for that by means
of improving the quantity rather than deepening
the quality.
Inebriation is not
an event that occurs with the intention
of jouissance, transcendence, creativity,
overflow of emotion, but rather a habitual
return to an oblivious state of mind. In
other words, it is not romantic inebriation
in the vein of Keats (Oh give me women,
wine and snuff/ Till I cry out Hold,
enough!) or Baudelaire (get
drunk... with wine, with poetry, or with
virtue, as you choose!) but the vomit
of a sub-urban mouse drunk on the rather
less exalted vintage found in sewers (actually,
the best lager I tasted in England was Czechoslovakian:
Tatran).
And have you ever seen
a mouse drunk on amour, virtu or poesie?
*
Sex is something that
usually takes place in the heart of the
dark hours (late at night and
early in the morning), preferably under
the non compos mentis excuse of being drunk
and disorderly. Deviation from this
pattern, either in the form of male exhortations
towards a day-time intercourse or as a non-pissed-out-of-your-head
approach, signify outright lechery and are
often thought to be the behavioural traits
of culturally underpriveleged individuals
and foreigners.
*
I shall recount an
event that took place whilst I was researching
the one-night-stand phenomenon. I had been
to the legendary Cavern, in Scouseland,
the club where the Beatles used to play.
I noticed one lady that was sat with somebody
of the same sex but rather older -she seemed
old enough to be her mother or aunt. As
the evening unfolded and the flirtation
increased in the shape of innuendo-imbued
half-clandestine glances, we finally found
each other dancing together and chatting.
At the end of the night I suggested that
we went somewhere together to which she
was reluctant as she had to return to the
hotel as she was staying with her aunt.
She said it would be nice to shag
your brains out but honestly there is no
way I could make it tonight, you see my
aunt wouldnt let me.
Upon hearing that,
an image was automatically visualized in
my mind whose morbidity was fit for a spooky
thriller making me reach the verge of nausea.
I would rather keep my brains in my skull
during sex if you dont mind, please,
I thought, as I imagined my brains escaping
my head and joining her astral brains somewhere
above our bodies in the midst of sexual
intercourse. I was so terrified with that
image that I sworn to abandon conducting
fieldwork in identified public sex environments,
But how can you shag your brains out?, I
managed to murmur in consternation, only
to recover from the shock a few years later
when my grasp of idiomatic English had improved.
*
Recreational drinking
sometimes results directly from squalor,
overwork and underpay, but sometimes also
from the possession of funds without an
accompanying tradition which ensures their
constructive application.
Brian Harrison,
Drink and the Victorians, p. 393
In other words, their
hedonistic excesses are desperate
reactions to the dynasty of a deeply ingrained
and culturally procured anaphia (inability
to touch) anhedonia (inability to
experience pleasure) and aphilokalia
(inability to experience beauty) - alexithymia
comes as a natural corollary of all these.
Indeed, their hedinistic excesses stand
for the death throes of unlived pleasured,
the false simulacra of convivialtity (only
to disintegrate with the mo[u]rning
after), accompanying that funeral
procession
which they euphemistically
call:
l i f e.
© Copyright
by Spiros
Doikas
back to contents
|