rogue state → κράτος-παρίας, κράτος-ταραξίας, απείθαρχο κράτος

[banned8]

Ποιος είπε ότι δεν καλύπτομαι από το "ταραξίες"; Ποια ήταν η αρχική μου απάντηση; Απλώς αποκλείω οποιαδήποτε αναφορά σε αλήτες, απατεώνες και εγκληματίες.

[wings]

Kαι λέει κι ο φίλος μας ο Τσόμσκι:

U.S. Policy

Rogue States

The concept "rogue state" is highly nuanced. The U.S. does not
fall into the category despite its terrorist attacks against Cuba for close to 40 years.

By Noam Chomsky

The concept of "rogue state" plays a pre-eminent role today in policy planning and analysis. The current Iraq crisis is only the latest example. Washington and London declared Iraq a "rogue state," a threat to its neighbors and to the entire world, an "outlaw nation" led by a reincarnation of Hitler who must be contained by the guardians of world order, the United States and its British "junior partner," to adopt the term ruefully employed by the British foreign office half a century ago. The concept merits a close look. But first, let’s consider its application in the current crisis.

The most interesting feature of the debate over the Iraq crisis is that it never took place. True, many words flowed, and there was dispute about how to proceed. But discussion kept within rigid bounds that excluded the obvious answer: the U.S. and UK should act in accord with their laws and treaty obligations.

The relevant legal framework is formulated in the Charter of the United Nations, a "solemn treaty" recognized as the foundation of international law and world order, and under the U.S. Constitution, "the supreme law of the land."
http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/articles/z9804-rogue.html

Εγώ σε απλό κείμενο δεν θα είχα ενδοιασμούς για τη λέξη «αλήτες» τουλάχιστον.

Ποιος είπε ότι δεν καλύπτομαι από το "ταραξίες"; Ποια ήταν η αρχική μου απάντηση; Απλώς αποκλείω οποιαδήποτε αναφορά σε αλήτες, απατεώνες και εγκληματίες.

Με βρίσκεις απόλυτα σύμφωνη. Και πάλι σας ευχαριστώ όλους.

[σα(ρε)μαλι]

Γενικώς ο ορισμός του κράτους-παρία/κράτους ταραξία αποτελεί αγκάθι ή μάλλον φιάσκο -μια ακόμη πέρλα στο περιδέραιο της αμερικάνικης μεταμοντέρνας ορολογίας.

Economic Foundations of The “Rogue State”

By: Ismael Hossein-zadeh, Drake University, Iowa
ismael.zadeh@drake.edu

Rogue state is a relatively new term that the US State Department has added to its foreign policy lexicon in the post-Cold War era. The term is said to be applicable to states that (a) support terrorism, (b) have developed or plan to develop missile programs and/or nuclear weapons, and (c) stir up regional or international tensions and are, therefore, “menaces” to world peace and stability. On all three accounts, the American state by far tops all other states, and is therefore, according to its own definition, the roguest state.

Architects of the term rogue state would, no doubt, cringe at this logical implication of their terminology, and would fiercely object to it. This is because, from their point of view, the US has a global custodial or policing obligation and is, therefore, justified in its accumulation of all kinds of destructive weaponry, including massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons. Furthermore, they choose to define terrorism in a narrow sense that does not include state-sponsored mass killings. Thus, conveniently, wholesale terrorization of, for example, Vietnamese civilians by the US armed forces during the Vietnam War occurred outside the official parameters of terrorism. The terrorization of the Palestinian people by the state of Israel falls into this same category, as does that of the Kurdish people by the Turkish state—both of which could be stopped if the US foreign policy imperatives so dictated or required.

The purpose of this essay is not, however, to engage in a polemic on the definition of “rogue states,”—the whole idea, beginning with the terminology itself, is a cheap, tasteless, disgusting and self-serving idea. My objective is, rather, to explore some of the economic interests that prompted and promoted this vulgar and offensive terminology.

http://www.payvand.com/news/01/jul/1117.html



   

[banned8]

Επίσης να εξηγήσω ότι η προσωπική μου αντίρρηση στο "παρίας", παρότι εξακολουθεί να είναι το πιο διαδεδομένο, δεν είναι για λόγους αντιρατσιστικής ευαισθησίας ούτε επειδή είναι κολλημένο στο παλιότερο pariah state, αλλά γιατί δίνει τη λάθος εικόνα, δηλ. του κράτους που αποκλείουν οι άλλοι, που δεν το παίζουν. Ενώ rogue states είναι τα κράτη που δεν θέλουν αυτά να μπουν στο παιχνίδι των μεγάλων.

[wings]

Να αποτολμήσω ανεπισήμως και τον χαρακτηρισμό που δεν είδα πουθενά αλλά μου αρέσει: «αυθάδικα» κράτη (πάντα κατά την κρίση των Αμερικανών).